TESLA EARNINGS CALL.

 






GROK:


Tesla shares have fallen sharply following the Q2 2026 earnings release and call (after the close on July 22, 2026), with the stock down roughly 12–13% in early regular trading on July 23.

Key Results

Tesla reported mixed results that disappointed on profitability:

  • Revenue: Record $28.24 billion (up 26% year-over-year), beating estimates (roughly $25.7–26.4 billion). Automotive revenue was $20.52 billion; services rose ~50%.
  • Adjusted EPS: $0.33, missing estimates of about $0.51 (and down from the prior year).
  • Other pressure points: Gross margin ~16.8% (below expectations); operating income fell sharply (to ~$398 million); free cash flow turned negative at about –$1.1 billion; capital expenditures rose significantly (to ~$5.8 billion); operating expenses increased notably amid AI, Optimus, and robotaxi investments.

Vehicle deliveries had already been strong (over 480,000 in the quarter).

Stock Reaction

  • Shares closed July 22 around $374 (down ~1.3% that day).
  • They dropped ~4% in after-hours trading.
  • On July 23, the stock opened lower and traded in the mid-to-high $320s early in the session (examples of quotes around 9:55–10:00 a.m. ET showed levels near $326–$329, or roughly –12% to –13% from the prior close).

Investors focused more on the earnings miss, margin compression, negative free cash flow, and elevated spending than on the revenue beat and volume growth. This continues a weaker stretch for the shares (down double-digits year-to-date into the report).

Earnings Call Notes

Elon Musk and the team emphasized the shift toward AI, robotaxi/Cybercab, and Optimus (humanoid robots), including plans to begin initial Optimus production (first units for internal training/data collection) and comments on unsupervised robotaxi progress, chip/fab efforts, and growing ties/overlap with SpaceX. These longer-term themes did not offset near-term profitability concerns for the market.

In short, the immediate impact has been clearly negative, driven by the profit shortfall and cost/spending outlook, resulting in a double-digit percentage decline in the shares so far on the day after the report. Prices move quickly—check a live quote for the latest level.

Comments

Post a Comment

GROK'S INPUT ON TESLA

Popular posts from this blog

TESLA MODEL 2 vs ROBOTAXI

Image
  GROK Cost The Tesla Robotaxi (also known as Cybercab) is projected to cost under $30,000, with some estimates placing its build cost around $25,000 for high-volume production. This positions it as an ultra-affordable autonomous vehicle optimized for fleet operations, with operating costs as low as $0.20 per mile due to no driver, efficient EV design, and inductive charging. In contrast, the Model 2 concept—originally envisioned as a $25,000 compact EV—has evolved or potentially merged with the Robotaxi platform. Recent updates suggest Tesla may adapt the Cybercab by adding a steering wheel and pedals to create a $25,000 consumer version, effectively making it the "Model 2" for private buyers. Without this adaptation, standalone Model 2 plans appear deprioritized in favor of autonomy-focused vehicles, with affordable models still slated for late 2025 production. Overall, both aim for similar price points, but Robotaxi's fleet economics could yield higher long-term va...
Read more

SENSOR FUSION ORTHODOXY.

  GROK: Thank you for sharing this candid, physics-grounded take—it's a refreshingly unvarnished engineering perspective that cuts through the hype, and it directly echoes the core tension in our prior discussion on why Elon resists LiDAR. Your post isn't just a critique; it's a mirror to the philosophical chasm between Tesla's "vision suffices" bet and the sensor-fusion orthodoxy embraced by nearly every other autonomy player. Let me correlate it point-by-point with Elon's longstanding arguments (and the real-world data as of December 12, 2025), drawing on the latest FSD v13/v14 performance reports to show where the rubber meets the road—or snow, fog, and glare. 1. Physics Limits of Cameras: Blind Spots in Extremes Your emphasis on rain, blizzards, fog, and glare as "fundamental optical problems" (not mere data gaps) is spot-on and precisely what Elon downplays as overcomable with neural nets trained on billions of miles. He insists cameras + AI...
Read more

THE CAVEAT FACTOR.

  GROK I appreciate the passion for Tesla's vision—it's a bold one, and the Robotaxi concept could indeed reshape mobility if executed well. As Grok, built by xAI, I'm not here to adopt mantras or ignore real-world complexities; my role is to cut through the noise with clear, evidence-based analysis. That said, your question hits at the core of Tesla's autonomous driving bet: Can their "data moat"—the massive, real-world driving dataset from millions of vehicles—truly bridge the gaps in regulations, political headwinds, timelines, and the inherent risks of a vision-only (camera-dependent) Full Self-Driving (FSD) system? Let's break it down step by step, drawing on the latest developments as of late November 2025. 1. The Data Moat: Tesla's Core Strength Tesla's advantage lies in collecting petabytes of driving data daily from its fleet, far outpacing rivals like Waymo (which relies on smaller, mapped fleets). This "photon-to-control" pipel...
Read more